Legal Teams// topic
Contract Review, Clause Risk and Redlining
In short
The analytical pass over a document already in front of you — pulling out the terms that matter, judging each clause against a playbook or market standard, and proposing an edit a lawyer can accept, reject or rewrite.
5 pages
definitions
- Defined terms: no clause can be judged without its definitionA capitalised term carries whatever meaning the contract assigns it, wherever that assignment happens to live. Judge the clause without resolving it and you have judged a sentence you have not read.definition6 min
- Fallback positions: preferred, acceptable and walk-away, in one ladderA playbook that records only your ideal clause can say the counterparty deviated. It cannot say what to send back, which is the part a negotiator needs.definition6 min
- Order of precedence: the clause that decides which document winsA precedence clause ranks a stack of documents. It is also why a single file is an incomplete unit of review: the same words bind or not, depending on which instrument controls.definition6 min
- The liability cap is three fields, and only one of them is a numberThe cap is not a number. It is an amount, a basis that computes the amount, and a list of obligations that sit outside both — and the third one decides how bad the worst day gets.definition8 min
- Third-party paper: why their template is a different job from your ownOn your own template, review is a diff against known positions in known places. On the counterparty's, you have to rebuild the map before you can judge a single clause.definition6 min
Working on something in this space?
Tell us where you are in a sentence or two. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team, and what a sensible first slice of the work looks like.
Start the conversation